Time Travel Novel

Time Travel Novel

Temporal Paradox: A contradiction of causality when the very flow of time collapses in on itself.

Clynton Murray and Jake Emerson stumble into a tachyon field generated in the future by a grieving inventor determined to rescue his younger brother and friends from a tragic sequence of events that unfolded in a rundown colliery town in the north-east of England on New Year’s Eve 1999. It’s a race against the clock to solve the mystery of how they ended up in the past, and a desperate quest to find a path back home as time itself becomes increasingly corrupted by Clynton and Jake’s repeated temporal incursions inside a newly created timeline. Moral dilemmas abound in the alternative history where the Moorton Minors didn’t die, but will be lost again if the original chronology is restored.

What exactly is a temporal paradox, and why does it send ripples of unease through our understanding of cause and effect? In essence, a temporal paradox is a logical contradiction that arises from the possibility of time travel. It's a scenario where an action, taken through time travel, creates a situation that makes the original action impossible or self-defeating, thereby breaking the fundamental chain of causality. Think of it as a snake trying to eat its own tail. If the snake succeeds, it ceases to exist, which means it could never have started eating its tail in the first place. This is the core of a temporal paradox – a closed loop of self-contradiction.

The most famous and illustrative example of a temporal paradox is the Grandfather Paradox. Imagine you build a time machine, travel back in time, and, for whatever reason, prevent your grandfather from meeting your grandmother. If they never meet, your father is never born, and subsequently, you are never born. But if you were never born, how could you have traveled back in time to prevent your grandparents from meeting in the first place? The very act of preventing your existence negates the possibility of you performing that act. Another common paradox is the Bootstrap Paradox, also known as an Ontological Paradox. This occurs when an object or piece of information has no discernible origin. Consider this: you find a brilliant novel, travel back in time, and give it to the author before they've written it. The author then publishes the novel. Who actually wrote it? The book appears to have no original creator; it simply exists, passed from the future to the past, creating a self-sustaining loop of information or an object without a true genesis.

The implications of temporal paradoxes are profound and, for many, deeply unsettling because they seem to violate the very foundations of our reality:

The Breakdown of Causality: Our universe operates on the principle of causality – every event has a cause, and effects follow causes in a linear fashion. Temporal paradoxes shatter this. If you can alter the past to prevent an event that led to your time travel, then the cause (your existence and motivation to time travel) is removed, yet the effect (your time travel itself) still occurs. This creates a logical rupture in the cause-and-effect chain.

The Unraveling of Reality: If paradoxes are possible, it suggests that reality itself could be fluid and unstable. A single, successful paradox could theoretically unravel the entire timeline, leading to a state of non-existence or a chaotic, unnavigable reality. The consistency of our shared experience hinges on the idea that the past is fixed and immutable.

The Question of Free Will vs. Determinism: The existence (or non-existence) of temporal paradoxes also touches upon the age-old debate of free will versus determinism. If the past can be changed, does that imply we have complete free will? Or, conversely, if the universe prevents paradoxes from occurring, does that suggest a predetermined reality where certain actions are simply impossible, regardless of our intentions?

The very idea of temporal paradoxes has spurred theoretical physicists and philosophers to propose various models of how time travel might work, or how paradoxes might be avoided:

The Self-Healing Timeline (Novikov Self-Consistency Principle): This theory suggests that the universe possesses an inherent mechanism to prevent paradoxes. Any attempt to alter the past in a way that would create a paradox would either fail or result in an outcome that, paradoxically, preserves the original timeline. For example, if you tried to prevent your grandfather from meeting your grandmother, some "accident" would befall you, ensuring they still met.

The Multiverse Hypothesis (Many-Worlds Interpretation): This popular solution posits that every time a choice is made or an event occurs that could lead to a paradox, the universe splits into parallel timelines. In one timeline, you successfully prevent your grandparents from meeting, but this creates a new branch where you were never born. You, however, continue to exist in the original timeline, or perhaps you've simply jumped to a different branch of reality.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Temporal Paradox Novel

Read for FREE on Kindle Unlimited

Temporal Paradox Novel




 

Time Travel Novel

What Readers Are SayingClever and often thought provoking moral dilemmas about changing the timeline. Read in one sitting then reread to fully appreciate the twists. Recommended not just for science fiction fans as it's an accessible and inventive story about family, friendship What Readers Are Sayingand loyalty across multiple timejumps with paradoxes driving the action.

Buy Temporal Paradox: The Moorton Minors Story on Amazon

 
 


Moorton Novels

North East England Novels


Progeny Novels

Family Business Novels


Lighthouse Project

Books Set in Uganda


Mailing List

Join Our Mailing List